Leadership questions for schools
The prospect and potential of taking on the third phase of the Building Powerful Learners programme will inevitably raise all manner of important questions. There are strategic, leadership and management questions that deserve consideration before school leaders can make a reasoned decision about how to tackle this important devlopment.
Here we outline the leadership considerations necessary for the successful implementation, namely:
1. Shared Values – How does phase 3 of Building Powerful Learners fit with our school’s ethos?
2. Skills – What sort of skills/competencies would the programme enhance?
3. Staff – How could we accommodate the staff development approach suggested?
4. Systems – How do we prevent it becoming a workload issue?
5. Structure – Who will lead it and what accountability may be needed?
6. Style – How are we going to support the programme?
7. Strategy – How do we expect phase 3 of Building Powerful Learners to work? How will we create and agree a plan to pull all this together?

Building Coherence – Leadership questions for schools
The key differences between this phase 3 unit, Building Coherence, and phases 1 and 2 of the Building Powerful Learners programme.
- Building Coherence is a programme containing 2 substantial units designed to be undertaken by small teams of teachers with a view to researching and developing whole school approaches. This could be achieved by two teams operating concurrently, or by one team that tackles the 2 units one after the other.
- The goal is to create consistency across the school in terms of the complex areas of:
- a) how learning behaviours are integrated into curriculum planning and lesson design;
- b) how the school tracks student learning behaviour growth.
- The blended learning approach and cycle of monthly meetings embedded in earlier phases is necessarily changed.
Read more about the development teams. ⬇️
Forming the development teams – some thoughts
Unlike phases 1 and 2 of Building Powerful Learners which involved all teachers in undertaking small scale action research projects in their classrooms, Building Coherence is designed to support small teams of teachers to explore how the school can achieve consistency in terms of curriculum/lesson design and in terms of tracking learning development. Where earlier phases were an inclusive, whole school activity, Building Coherence is intentionally strategic in that it seeks to create whole school practices going forward.
This leads the school to several questions to be answered at the outset:
- Do we see this as a developmental opportunity for some less experienced colleagues, as a wholly strategic exercise that requires experience, or most likely a combination of these two approaches? This will impact on how you choose to form your teams.
- Do we form one team that tackles each unit in turn? Or do we form 2 teams, each focussing on one of the units? [We anticipate that each unit may take 6 months or so to complete.]
- How will we build team membership – volunteers? nominated by senior leaders? A mix?
- How will we ensure that the teams are sufficiently large to engage a range of views, yet sufficiently compact for reasons of efficiency?
- And, critically, how will we maintain momentum and interest in teachers who are not directly involved in the Building Coherence teams?
Keep these questions in mind as you work towards building your strategic plan for implementing Building Coherence.
1. Shared Values – How does phase 3 of Building Powerful Learners fit with our school’s ethos?
Given that the school has decided to continue Building Powerful Learners, it is reasonable to assume that this sits well with the school’s ethos and aspirations.
Leaders would do well to consider, in advance, how they are going to mirror the 4 aspects of classroom culture in their leadership approach. To align their leadership behaviours with the classroom culture developed in Building Powerful Learners, how will leaders:
- devolve responsibility to teams and coach their development?
- support team members to understand and exercise their team responsibilities?
- build challenge and reflection into their leadership of the programme?
- share emerging developments and celebrate successes?
2. Skills – What sort of skills/competencies would the programme enhance?
Building Coherence is a step change from phases 1 and 2 of Building Powerful Learners. It seeks to enable schools to develop consistent approaches to: planning learning behaviours into curriculum/lesson planning; and to tracking students’ growth as learners as they move through your school.
The impacts, in the longer term, will be considerable in terms of weaving the development of learning behaviours into delivery, and in terms of the monitoring and evaluation of learning behaviour growth over time.
3. Staff – How could we accommodate the staff development approach suggested?
Team members will begin to trial some aspects of building learning behaviours into curriculum delivery and of monitoring the growth of learning behaviours as they engage with the Building Coherence units. But what of those teachers who are not directly involved in these teams?
The risk here is that you may, unintentionally signal that Building Powerful Learners has ‘done its job’ and all that is left is to build a couple of new systems to implement it.
As the phase 2 programmes Building the Scope and Building Depth readily show, phase 1 was a great place to start, but a terrible place to finish. There is still much to do to consolidate the gains from phases 1 and 2 of Building Powerful Learners and teachers who are not involved in the phase 3 teams should continue to embed the phase 2 ideas into their everyday practice. Whether you have chosen Building the Scope or Building Depth at phase 2, there is sufficient material in each to support teachers’ development over a couple of years or so.
4. Systems – How do we need to adapt our existing working practices?
Inevitably, this depends on the approach the school plans to take.
Team members may well need additional time to undertake their team responsibilities as they will also be continuing to explore the phase 2 units alongside all of their colleagues. Recognise that teachers involved in a phase 3 team will be doing this in addition to working on phase 2, not instead of.
In order to maintain momentum among teachers who are not part of the Building Coherence teams, challenge them to continue working on the phase 2 Building Powerful Learners package – there are more than sufficient materials to keep things ticking over.
We suggest that you work on a termly cycle which will enable you to integrate the scheduling of interim and final reports from Building Coherence with reports/showcase events arising from your phase 2 programme.
5. Structure – Who will lead it and what accountability may be needed?
- Building Coherence implies a small team approach. Each team will need oversight / leadership.
- Decide on the extent to which this requires senior leader involvement.
- Whoever you choose to lead the teams, how will you ensure that they have sufficient time to familiarise themselves with Building Coherence before it is launched to staff?
- Will there be a written job description for the team leaders?
- How will you ensure that the team leaders have sufficient time to discharge their responsibilities?
6. Style – How are we going to support the programme?
- How will leaders create the conditions where development teams are encouraged to take risks, to try things out, to fail in safety?
- How will leaders demonstrate an ongoing interest in the enquiries that teams are undertaking?
- Given that the monthly meeting cycle no longer enables leaders to keep a close eye on emerging practice, how will leaders keep close to the ideas being developed by the teams?
7. Strategy – How do we expect phase 2 of Building Powerful Learners to work? How will we create and agree a plan to pull all this together?
- Will this be a top-down ‘initiative’, or will we involve all staff in the forward planning?
- How will we keep the strategy ‘tight but loose’? – tight enough to create momentum and maintain sustained interest, yet sufficiently loose to flex and accommodate emerging needs as necessary.
- How are you planning to maintain the interest of teachers who are not involved in the working party(s)?
- The level of detail contained in your plan is important. It sends a message to staff and to Governors that you have considered a wide range of programme related issues and provides a route map for implementation.















Growing revising; a trajectory of developing behaviours, skills, attitudes and self-talk
Get a handle on progression















Get a handle on progression









Get a handle on progression






Get a handle on progression
Collect a pile of unrelated objects, or ask students to bring in one object each and mix them in random groupings – eg a copper tube, piece of cloth, felt pen, blu-tack. 
At the beginning of a session talk with the children about the strategies and things they might use to help them with their learning.


Get a handle on progression
Explore sentences spoken with different stress, tone, pace and emphasis, to yield different meanings.



Get a handle on progression





Get a handle on progression










































































































Teacher talk
















.png)











































































The learning culture wheel is made up of the four aspects of culture depicted in four shades of green:
































































































