Professional Learning Teams: what and how
The purpose of these meetings is for the team to act as a teacher learning community or Professional Learning Team: a small group of teachers who meet together regularly to deepen their understanding of building better learners, commit to trying out new things, reflect on and share their experiments with each other. Such learning communities are the engines of teacher development. They work best with 6-8 teachers with similar subjects or age groups, and who meet for about an hour regularly over a period of a couple of years.
The group question and probe each other’s summaries of their experiments in order to encourage analysis and deeper reflection. They use questions such as ‘What do you think is getting in the way? What would make this even better?
How could this technique be modified to make it work for you? What do you think made that happen? In this way they support each other in changing and developing their practice.
Some guidelines for team reflection sessions
The delicate, hard work of changing practice requires a safe professional environment in which to explore and understand both triumphs and tribulations. These short guidelines may be helpful in setting a climate for the team itself.
- Everyone is expected to report back on their classroom experiments
- Coaching questions and probes of colleagues’ classroom experiments encourage deeper reflection.
- The group is careful to follow their agreed ground rules which might include;
- No group member can ‘pass’
- Listen between the lines when it’s not your turn
- Actively discuss everyone’s input
- Constructive criticism – developmental not judgemental
- Everyone fully engaged in the group
•What is said is confidential to the group
• Respect others’ views and encourage others’ ideas - No-put downs
- Maintain an open mind
What-Why-How-of-PLT.pdf
Session agenda
1. Session objectives
What do we want to achieve? (5 mins)
2. Sharing classroom experiments
How did our experiments go? (20 mins)
Share
- the changes in practice you tried
- how students reacted
- what you learned
- what next as a result
Probe
- what was getting in the way?
- what seemed difficult?
- what would make it easier?
- what made it work particularly well?
- why it was successful?
- changes in your behaviour
Talk about impact
- improvements in students’ behaviour
- more/renewed interest in the subject
- more harmony in the classroom
- greater willingness to try, and try different ways
- Avoidance of…..
- Improvements in……
- Increases in…….
- Little of no changes in…
3. Recapping on-line materials.
What did we think of the materials? ( 15 mins)
Reactions to
- The Reasoning grid
- Where students are secure
- Where the students could be secure when they leave secondary school
- Activities and talk ideas
4. Planning what to do.
What do we need to do next? ( 10 mins )
Decide
- Which ideas should we all adopt as a school strategy?
- How the progression of Reasoning should be built across the school. ie how the phases of Reasoning might play out against key stages and even year groups.
5. Personal action planning.
What am I going to do? ( 20 mins )
5a. Consider
- how you want your students to improve/develop/enhance their approach to Reasoning?
- what are you going to do to bring this about?
- develop your enquiry question.
Think of it like this…
If I do XXXX will it improve/develop/enhance YYYY
This is the crunch question. Your students are unlikely to change unless you change!
Capture your learning enquiry as a question
Developing-an-enquiry-question-Reasoning.pdf5b. Put a short enquiry plan together
Personal-Action-Plan-Reasoning.pdf5c. Discuss which of these possible impacts on students have been observed;
- improved ability to describe what they are thinking
- increased willingness to explain why they think something
- greater inclination to think before taking action
- willingness to undertake problem solving activities
- inclination to support their answers with evidence
- more inclined to want reasons or proof
- increased preparedness to work methodically
- improved ability to justify what they believe
- willingness to construct well-honed arguments
- use a broadening range of reasoning strategies
- others you may have observed…
Or if you want to be more specific you could use the indicators from the progression grid
6. Evaluate team session
How did we do as a team? ( 5 mins )
- Did we achieve our objectives?
- Are we comfortable with what we are trying to achieve?
- Any concerns at this point?
- Next meeting date and time.













































































































































